Preparing for a SOC 2 audit? Determining whether you need a SOC 2 Type 1 or a SOC 2 Type 2 report is crucial for your compliance and client trust. Ask yourself the following questions to guide your decision:
- Do you need SOC 2 reporting at all for your organization?
- Would a SOC 2 Type 1 report be sufficient to meet your initial requirements?
- Do you require a SOC 2 Type 2 report to demonstrate ongoing security controls over time?
- Could your business benefit from having both a Type 1 and a Type 2 report?
Do You Need a SOC 2 Report?
Choosing the right SOC audit can be confusing. There are several types of System and Organization Controls (SOC) reports, and each serves a different purpose. If you’re a service organization, such as an IT, cloud, or technology provider, understanding these differences is critical.
SOC 2 reports, including the SOC 2 Type 2, are designed for technical audiences such as assessors, auditors, or business partners. They provide assurance regarding your organization’s security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy controls. Unlike SOC 3 reports, which are meant for a general audience, SOC 2 reports are detailed and in-depth.
SOC 1 reports, on the other hand, are tailored specifically for financial services providers and focus on financial controls. SOC 3 reports are often used to summarize SOC 2 findings for public distribution.
For most service organizations, the key decision comes down to whether you need a SOC 2 Type 1 report or a SOC 2 Type 2 report, the latter demonstrates that your controls are effective over time, which can be critical for building trust with clients and partners.
When to Conduct a SOC 2 Type 1 Audit
A SOC 2 Type 1 audit evaluates the design of your cybersecurity controls at a specific point in time. Unlike a SOC 2 Type 2 report, which assesses controls over an extended period, a Type 1 audit provides a snapshot of how your systems are structured to protect data. Think of it as a moment-in-time review of your cyber defense.
You should consider a SOC 2 Type 1 audit when:
- You need the report quickly (Type 1 audits can be completed faster than Type 2)
- Resources or budget are limited (Type 1 audits are typically less expensive)
- The level of assurance required is relatively low or preliminary
While Type 1 audits are valuable, they cannot offer the same level of assurance as a SOC 2 Type 2 report. Because they only assess controls at a single point in time, results may not reflect how controls perform consistently over weeks or months. Type 2 audits, by contrast, demonstrate the effectiveness of controls over time, providing stronger assurance to clients and stakeholders.
When to Conduct a SOC 2 Type 2 Audit
A SOC 2 Type 2 report is more comprehensive than a Type 1 audit. Unlike Type 1, which evaluates controls at a single point in time, a Type 2 audit assesses the effectiveness of your controls over an extended period, typically six months or more. Assessors monitor your systems in action to ensure your cybersecurity protections actually function as intended.
If a SOC 2 Type 1 audit is like a snapshot, a SOC 2 Type 2 report is more like a documentary, showing ongoing performance and reliability over time.
You should consider a SOC 2 Type 2 audit when:
- The report deadline is flexible and allows for a monitoring period of several months
- Your organization has sufficient cybersecurity staff and resources
- Stakeholders or clients require the highest level of security assurance
Why it matters: SOC 2 Type 2 audits provide the most thorough assurance under the Trust Services Criteria (TSC) framework. While SOC 3 reports can offer similar coverage for public dissemination, they do not carry the formal designation of “Type 2” and are generally intended for broader audiences rather than technical stakeholders.
When to Conduct Both SOC 2 Type 1 and Type 2 Audits
Many organizations find it beneficial to produce both a SOC 2 Type 1 report and a SOC 2 Type 2 report. This approach is common when a client or stakeholder requires the long-term assurance of a Type 2 report but is willing to accept a Type 1 report in the short term while the full audit is completed.
For example, if your organization is scaling to work with larger or more mature clients who expect SOC compliance, it’s reasonable that your past clients may not have required formal SOC reporting. To meet these new expectations, you can issue one or more SOC 2 Type 1 initially, providing reassurance, while working toward a full SOC 2 Type 2 to demonstrate ongoing control effectiveness.
Tip: For most service organizations, the most efficient path to SOC 2 compliance, whether Type 1, Type 2, or both is to partner with a trusted managed security services provider (MSSP), like RSI Security. They can help ensure your audits are thorough, accurate, and completed in a timely manner.
Fulfill Your SOC 2 Reporting Needs
For service organizations across industries, SOC 2 reporting is one of the most effective ways to demonstrate to clients that you take security seriously. While SOC 2 Type 1 are suitable for quick turnarounds, a SOC 2 Type 2 report provides the highest level of assurance by showing that your controls are effective over time.
RSI Security has helped countless organizations prepare for and successfully conduct SOC audits of all kinds. Establishing strong controls and compliance practices early allows your organization to grow confidently, both within your current market and into new areas.
Take the next step: To learn more about how a SOC 2 Type 2 report can strengthen your client trust and compliance posture, contact RSI Security today.
Download Our SOC 2 Compliance Checklist